Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
This should make it much more obvious (via check-near-bragg) when the peak positions are wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure I've fixed this bug many times before...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was totally broken and wrong, and just added noise to the data, and it
should be done at the scaling stage instead of now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cutoff is disabled at the moment, because the sigmas are garbage
|
|
|
|
|
|
It wasn't implemented, anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even in the contrived case that the intensity is negative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|