Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was actually fine, becuase "refl" isn't used again until it's re-set
at the start of the next loop iteration. However, it was confusing.
|
|
|
|
I'd been lazy with the first implementation, and it's turned out to be too
slow. Instead of calculating the entire CChalf each time removing a
different crystal, this makes it store some intermediate values so that a
crystal can easily be subtracted afterwards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initially set at mean deltaCChalf minus 2 sigma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This partially reverts 0bcfe3cdf917ae53764c423c7af865352af47920.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|