diff options
author | Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> | 2009-02-14 23:59:18 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2009-02-15 09:03:29 +0100 |
commit | f6db44df5bd39ed33883786d35342759af796e4a (patch) | |
tree | 1ca60ed13539b7a795d987b44fe2bf12ca423685 | |
parent | b38b0665905538e76e26f2a4c686179abb1f69f6 (diff) |
x86: fix typo in filter_cpuid_features()
Impact: fix wrong disabling of cpu features
an amd system got this strange output:
CPU: CPU feature monitor disabled due to lack of CPUID level 0x5
but in /proc/cpuinfo I have:
cpuid level : 5
on intel system:
CPU: CPU feature monitor disabled due to lack of CPUID level 0x5
CPU: CPU feature dca disabled due to lack of CPUID level 0x9
but in /proc/cpuinfo i have:
cpuid level : 11
Tt turns out there is a typo, and we should use level member in df.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c index 21f086b4c1a..32093d08d87 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -241,9 +241,9 @@ static void __cpuinit filter_cpuid_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, bool warn) * signs here... */ if (cpu_has(c, df->feature) && - ((s32)df->feature < 0 ? - (u32)df->feature > (u32)c->extended_cpuid_level : - (s32)df->feature > (s32)c->cpuid_level)) { + ((s32)df->level < 0 ? + (u32)df->level > (u32)c->extended_cpuid_level : + (s32)df->level > (s32)c->cpuid_level)) { clear_cpu_cap(c, df->feature); if (warn) printk(KERN_WARNING @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static void __cpuinit filter_cpuid_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, bool warn) df->level); } } -} +} /* * Naming convention should be: <Name> [(<Codename>)] |