aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>2010-01-06 10:56:31 -0800
committerH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>2010-01-06 12:08:43 -0800
commit7f41c2e1523f628cc248e34192162aec5728bed7 (patch)
treee1fcc3ebc1530bee357b21ba42091b385f3eba48 /arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu
parent409d02ef6d74f5e91f5ea4c587b2ee1375f106fc (diff)
x86, irq: Check move_in_progress before freeing the vector mapping
With the recent irq migration fixes (post 2.6.32), Gary Hade has noticed "No IRQ handler for vector" messages during the 2.6.33-rc1 kernel boot on IBM AMD platforms and root caused the issue to this commit: > commit 23359a88e7eca3c4f402562b102f23014db3c2aa > Author: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> > Date: Mon Oct 26 14:24:33 2009 -0800 > > x86: Remove move_cleanup_count from irq_cfg As part of this patch, we have removed the move_cleanup_count check in smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt(). With this change, we can run into a situation where an irq cleanup interrupt on a cpu can cleanup the vector mappings associated with multiple irqs, of which one of the irq's migration might be still in progress. As such when that irq hits the old cpu, we get the "No IRQ handler" messages. Fix this by checking for the irq_cfg's move_in_progress and if the move is still in progress delay the vector cleanup to another irq cleanup interrupt request (which will happen when the irq starts arriving at the new cpu destination). Reported-and-tested-by: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> LKML-Reference: <1262804191.2732.7.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions