aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDmitry Mishin <dim@openvz.org>2006-08-09 02:25:54 -0700
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2006-08-09 02:25:54 -0700
commit7c91767a6b701543c93ebcd611dab61deff3dad1 (patch)
tree5ccc47d32641d1dacff118bb6b4f7256acb8e2dc /include
parent7b1ba8de569460894efa892457af7a37c0d574f9 (diff)
[NET]: add_timer -> mod_timer() in dst_run_gc()
Patch from Dmitry Mishin <dim@openvz.org>: Replace add_timer() by mod_timer() in dst_run_gc in order to avoid BUG message. CPU1 CPU2 dst_run_gc() entered dst_run_gc() entered spin_lock(&dst_lock) ..... del_timer(&dst_gc_timer) fail to get lock .... mod_timer() <--- puts timer back to the list add_timer(&dst_gc_timer) <--- BUG because timer is in list already. Found during OpenVZ internal testing. At first we thought that it is OpenVZ specific as we added dst_run_gc(0) call in dst_dev_event(), but as Alexey pointed to me it is possible to trigger this condition in mainstream kernel. F.e. timer has fired on CPU2, but the handler was preeempted by an irq before dst_lock is tried. Meanwhile, someone on CPU1 adds an entry to gc list and starts the timer. If CPU2 was preempted long enough, this timer can expire simultaneously with resuming timer handler on CPU1, arriving exactly to the situation described. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Mishin <dim@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions