aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--Documentation/hwmon/coretemp2
-rw-r--r--drivers/hwmon/Kconfig6
-rw-r--r--drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c29
3 files changed, 23 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/coretemp b/Documentation/hwmon/coretemp
index dbbe6c7025b..d3d79e65871 100644
--- a/Documentation/hwmon/coretemp
+++ b/Documentation/hwmon/coretemp
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Kernel driver coretemp
Supported chips:
* All Intel Core family
Prefix: 'coretemp'
- CPUID: family 0x6, models 0xe, 0xf, 0x16, 0x17
+ CPUID: family 0x6, models 0xe, 0xf, 0x16, 0x17, 0x1c (Atom)
Datasheet: Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual
Volume 3A: System Programming Guide
http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/Wiki/Mobility/720.htm
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
index 9d881f70891..6857560144b 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
@@ -373,12 +373,12 @@ config SENSORS_GL520SM
will be called gl520sm.
config SENSORS_CORETEMP
- tristate "Intel Core (2) Duo/Solo temperature sensor"
+ tristate "Intel Core/Core2/Atom temperature sensor"
depends on X86 && EXPERIMENTAL
help
If you say yes here you get support for the temperature
- sensor inside your CPU. Supported all are all known variants
- of Intel Core family.
+ sensor inside your CPU. Most of the family 6 CPUs
+ are supported. Check documentation/driver for details.
config SENSORS_IBMAEM
tristate "IBM Active Energy Manager temperature/power sensors and control"
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
index 972cf4ba963..4c15ed7eb78 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
@@ -157,17 +157,24 @@ static int __devinit adjust_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id, struct device *
/* The 100C is default for both mobile and non mobile CPUs */
int tjmax = 100000;
- int ismobile = 1;
+ int usemsr_ee = 1;
int err;
u32 eax, edx;
/* Early chips have no MSR for TjMax */
if ((c->x86_model == 0xf) && (c->x86_mask < 4)) {
- ismobile = 0;
+ usemsr_ee = 0;
}
- if ((c->x86_model > 0xe) && (ismobile)) {
+ /* Atoms seems to have TjMax at 90C */
+
+ if (c->x86_model == 0x1c) {
+ usemsr_ee = 0;
+ tjmax = 90000;
+ }
+
+ if ((c->x86_model > 0xe) && (usemsr_ee)) {
/* Now we can detect the mobile CPU using Intel provided table
http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/Wiki/Mobility/720.htm
@@ -179,13 +186,13 @@ static int __devinit adjust_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id, struct device *
dev_warn(dev,
"Unable to access MSR 0x17, assuming desktop"
" CPU\n");
- ismobile = 0;
+ usemsr_ee = 0;
} else if (!(eax & 0x10000000)) {
- ismobile = 0;
+ usemsr_ee = 0;
}
}
- if (ismobile || c->x86_model == 0x1c) {
+ if (usemsr_ee) {
err = rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(id, 0xee, &eax, &edx);
if (err) {
@@ -195,7 +202,9 @@ static int __devinit adjust_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id, struct device *
} else if (eax & 0x40000000) {
tjmax = 85000;
}
- } else {
+ /* if we dont use msr EE it means we are desktop CPU (with exeception
+ of Atom) */
+ } else if (tjmax == 100000) {
dev_warn(dev, "Using relative temperature scale!\n");
}
@@ -248,9 +257,9 @@ static int __devinit coretemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
/* read the still undocumented IA32_TEMPERATURE_TARGET it exists
- on older CPUs but not in this register */
+ on older CPUs but not in this register, Atoms don't have it either */
- if (c->x86_model > 0xe) {
+ if ((c->x86_model > 0xe) && (c->x86_model != 0x1c)) {
err = rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(data->id, 0x1a2, &eax, &edx);
if (err) {
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Unable to read"
@@ -413,7 +422,7 @@ static int __init coretemp_init(void)
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(i);
- /* check if family 6, models 0xe, 0xf, 0x16, 0x17, 0x1A */
+ /* check if family 6, models 0xe, 0xf, 0x16, 0x17, 0x1A, 0x1c */
if ((c->cpuid_level < 0) || (c->x86 != 0x6) ||
!((c->x86_model == 0xe) || (c->x86_model == 0xf) ||
(c->x86_model == 0x16) || (c->x86_model == 0x17) ||