diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/DocBook')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/DocBook/kernel-locking.tmpl | 57 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/DocBook/uio-howto.tmpl | 63 |
2 files changed, 75 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/kernel-locking.tmpl b/Documentation/DocBook/kernel-locking.tmpl index 2510763295d..084f6ad7b7a 100644 --- a/Documentation/DocBook/kernel-locking.tmpl +++ b/Documentation/DocBook/kernel-locking.tmpl @@ -219,10 +219,10 @@ </para> <sect1 id="lock-intro"> - <title>Three Main Types of Kernel Locks: Spinlocks, Mutexes and Semaphores</title> + <title>Two Main Types of Kernel Locks: Spinlocks and Mutexes</title> <para> - There are three main types of kernel locks. The fundamental type + There are two main types of kernel locks. The fundamental type is the spinlock (<filename class="headerfile">include/asm/spinlock.h</filename>), which is a very simple single-holder lock: if you can't get the @@ -240,14 +240,6 @@ use a spinlock instead. </para> <para> - The third type is a semaphore - (<filename class="headerfile">include/linux/semaphore.h</filename>): it - can have more than one holder at any time (the number decided at - initialization time), although it is most commonly used as a - single-holder lock (a mutex). If you can't get a semaphore, your - task will be suspended and later on woken up - just like for mutexes. - </para> - <para> Neither type of lock is recursive: see <xref linkend="deadlock"/>. </para> @@ -278,7 +270,7 @@ </para> <para> - Semaphores still exist, because they are required for + Mutexes still exist, because they are required for synchronization between <firstterm linkend="gloss-usercontext">user contexts</firstterm>, as we will see below. </para> @@ -289,18 +281,17 @@ <para> If you have a data structure which is only ever accessed from - user context, then you can use a simple semaphore - (<filename>linux/linux/semaphore.h</filename>) to protect it. This - is the most trivial case: you initialize the semaphore to the number - of resources available (usually 1), and call - <function>down_interruptible()</function> to grab the semaphore, and - <function>up()</function> to release it. There is also a - <function>down()</function>, which should be avoided, because it + user context, then you can use a simple mutex + (<filename>include/linux/mutex.h</filename>) to protect it. This + is the most trivial case: you initialize the mutex. Then you can + call <function>mutex_lock_interruptible()</function> to grab the mutex, + and <function>mutex_unlock()</function> to release it. There is also a + <function>mutex_lock()</function>, which should be avoided, because it will not return if a signal is received. </para> <para> - Example: <filename>linux/net/core/netfilter.c</filename> allows + Example: <filename>net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c</filename> allows registration of new <function>setsockopt()</function> and <function>getsockopt()</function> calls, with <function>nf_register_sockopt()</function>. Registration and @@ -515,7 +506,7 @@ <listitem> <para> If you are in a process context (any syscall) and want to - lock other process out, use a semaphore. You can take a semaphore + lock other process out, use a mutex. You can take a mutex and sleep (<function>copy_from_user*(</function> or <function>kmalloc(x,GFP_KERNEL)</function>). </para> @@ -662,7 +653,7 @@ <entry>SLBH</entry> <entry>SLBH</entry> <entry>SLBH</entry> -<entry>DI</entry> +<entry>MLI</entry> <entry>None</entry> </row> @@ -692,8 +683,8 @@ <entry>spin_lock_bh</entry> </row> <row> -<entry>DI</entry> -<entry>down_interruptible</entry> +<entry>MLI</entry> +<entry>mutex_lock_interruptible</entry> </row> </tbody> @@ -1310,7 +1301,7 @@ as Alan Cox says, <quote>Lock data, not code</quote>. <para> There is a coding bug where a piece of code tries to grab a spinlock twice: it will spin forever, waiting for the lock to - be released (spinlocks, rwlocks and semaphores are not + be released (spinlocks, rwlocks and mutexes are not recursive in Linux). This is trivial to diagnose: not a stay-up-five-nights-talk-to-fluffy-code-bunnies kind of problem. @@ -1335,7 +1326,7 @@ as Alan Cox says, <quote>Lock data, not code</quote>. <para> This complete lockup is easy to diagnose: on SMP boxes the - watchdog timer or compiling with <symbol>DEBUG_SPINLOCKS</symbol> set + watchdog timer or compiling with <symbol>DEBUG_SPINLOCK</symbol> set (<filename>include/linux/spinlock.h</filename>) will show this up immediately when it happens. </para> @@ -1558,7 +1549,7 @@ the amount of locking which needs to be done. <title>Read/Write Lock Variants</title> <para> - Both spinlocks and semaphores have read/write variants: + Both spinlocks and mutexes have read/write variants: <type>rwlock_t</type> and <structname>struct rw_semaphore</structname>. These divide users into two classes: the readers and the writers. If you are only reading the data, you can get a read lock, but to write to @@ -1681,7 +1672,7 @@ the amount of locking which needs to be done. #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/string.h> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h> - #include <linux/semaphore.h> + #include <linux/mutex.h> #include <asm/errno.h> struct object @@ -1913,7 +1904,7 @@ machines due to caching. </listitem> <listitem> <para> - <function> put_user()</function> + <function>put_user()</function> </para> </listitem> </itemizedlist> @@ -1927,13 +1918,13 @@ machines due to caching. <listitem> <para> - <function>down_interruptible()</function> and - <function>down()</function> + <function>mutex_lock_interruptible()</function> and + <function>mutex_lock()</function> </para> <para> - There is a <function>down_trylock()</function> which can be + There is a <function>mutex_trylock()</function> which can be used inside interrupt context, as it will not sleep. - <function>up()</function> will also never sleep. + <function>mutex_unlock()</function> will also never sleep. </para> </listitem> </itemizedlist> @@ -2023,7 +2014,7 @@ machines due to caching. <para> Prior to 2.5, or when <symbol>CONFIG_PREEMPT</symbol> is unset, processes in user context inside the kernel would not - preempt each other (ie. you had that CPU until you have it up, + preempt each other (ie. you had that CPU until you gave it up, except for interrupts). With the addition of <symbol>CONFIG_PREEMPT</symbol> in 2.5.4, this changed: when in user context, higher priority tasks can "cut in": spinlocks diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/uio-howto.tmpl b/Documentation/DocBook/uio-howto.tmpl index fdd7f4f887b..df87d1b9360 100644 --- a/Documentation/DocBook/uio-howto.tmpl +++ b/Documentation/DocBook/uio-howto.tmpl @@ -21,6 +21,18 @@ </affiliation> </author> +<copyright> + <year>2006-2008</year> + <holder>Hans-Jürgen Koch.</holder> +</copyright> + +<legalnotice> +<para> +This documentation is Free Software licensed under the terms of the +GPL version 2. +</para> +</legalnotice> + <pubdate>2006-12-11</pubdate> <abstract> @@ -30,6 +42,12 @@ <revhistory> <revision> + <revnumber>0.5</revnumber> + <date>2008-05-22</date> + <authorinitials>hjk</authorinitials> + <revremark>Added description of write() function.</revremark> + </revision> + <revision> <revnumber>0.4</revnumber> <date>2007-11-26</date> <authorinitials>hjk</authorinitials> @@ -57,20 +75,9 @@ </bookinfo> <chapter id="aboutthisdoc"> -<?dbhtml filename="about.html"?> +<?dbhtml filename="aboutthis.html"?> <title>About this document</title> -<sect1 id="copyright"> -<?dbhtml filename="copyright.html"?> -<title>Copyright and License</title> -<para> - Copyright (c) 2006 by Hans-Jürgen Koch.</para> -<para> -This documentation is Free Software licensed under the terms of the -GPL version 2. -</para> -</sect1> - <sect1 id="translations"> <?dbhtml filename="translations.html"?> <title>Translations</title> @@ -189,6 +196,30 @@ interested in translating it, please email me represents the total interrupt count. You can use this number to figure out if you missed some interrupts. </para> + <para> + For some hardware that has more than one interrupt source internally, + but not separate IRQ mask and status registers, there might be + situations where userspace cannot determine what the interrupt source + was if the kernel handler disables them by writing to the chip's IRQ + register. In such a case, the kernel has to disable the IRQ completely + to leave the chip's register untouched. Now the userspace part can + determine the cause of the interrupt, but it cannot re-enable + interrupts. Another cornercase is chips where re-enabling interrupts + is a read-modify-write operation to a combined IRQ status/acknowledge + register. This would be racy if a new interrupt occurred + simultaneously. + </para> + <para> + To address these problems, UIO also implements a write() function. It + is normally not used and can be ignored for hardware that has only a + single interrupt source or has separate IRQ mask and status registers. + If you need it, however, a write to <filename>/dev/uioX</filename> + will call the <function>irqcontrol()</function> function implemented + by the driver. You have to write a 32-bit value that is usually either + 0 or 1 to disable or enable interrupts. If a driver does not implement + <function>irqcontrol()</function>, <function>write()</function> will + return with <varname>-ENOSYS</varname>. + </para> <para> To handle interrupts properly, your custom kernel module can @@ -362,6 +393,14 @@ device is actually used. <function>open()</function>, you will probably also want a custom <function>release()</function> function. </para></listitem> + +<listitem><para> +<varname>int (*irqcontrol)(struct uio_info *info, s32 irq_on) +</varname>: Optional. If you need to be able to enable or disable +interrupts from userspace by writing to <filename>/dev/uioX</filename>, +you can implement this function. The parameter <varname>irq_on</varname> +will be 0 to disable interrupts and 1 to enable them. +</para></listitem> </itemizedlist> <para> |